TRAUMA REGISTRYLow and middle income countries are faced with challenges and pressures of health care inequities and scarcity of resources. There is an urgent need to provide both essential and cost effective trauma care. However, a major impediment to trauma system development and provision of essential trauma care in these regions is inadequate or nonexistent data.
The International Trauma System Development Program (ITSDP) in collaboration with the Panamerican Trauma Society offer a cost-effective web-based Trauma Registry (TR). The TR allows hospitals to track and monitor their emergency and trauma services and to be able to generate basic and valid data about the true burden of trauma injuries (quantity, type, mechanisms).
The TR is a user-friendly, electronic hospital-based injury surveillance tool that systematically stores data of trauma patients which can be used to accurately assess the true burden of injury; and, it can also support quality improvement efforts, assessment of clinical performance, and overall quality of care.
The TR exceeds the minimum technical and security requirements recommended for any patient registry (i.e. data validation, storing and securing data safeguards, backing-up capabilities, user-friendly, web-based, customization, data downloading, and integration of ICD-10 codes).
The main objective of the TR is to store raw data from patients seen in the emergency and trauma services. The raw data, then, can be analyzed to support quality improvement efforts, assessment of clinical performance, and overall quality of care.
The Trauma Registry provides hospitals solid evidence to support hospital’s performance and quality improvement efforts by:
Establishing a performance baseline. Knowing the baseline statistics (real numbers) allow comparison and definition of benchmarks. Usually, numbers far above or, far below the baseline are candidates for further investigation. They may indicate areas for improvement or reconfiguration.
Identifying strengths, weakness, and resources. Recognizing strengths, weaknesses and available resources allow the leadership team to define an action plan for closing identified gaps in clinical interventions, policies, workforce capabilities, and other performance measures.
Fairly allocating scarce resources. Supporting evidence-based resource allocation decisions for trauma and emergency systems is essential when the equitable and appropriate distribution of limited resources (financial, technical and knowledge) is necessary.
Identifying needs for continuous quality improvement. Recognizing opportunities for improvement (identifying problems) lead to the implementation and monitoring of corrective actions and assessing their effectiveness. A risk-based approach to quality care focuses on the most important causes of errors or procedural lapses.
Assessing needs for evidence-based clinical protocols and training. Identifying and addressing training needs and having available up-to-date clinical protocols and guidelines have been shown to reduce undesirable patient outcomes through improved standardization and communication.
Influencing injury prevention and control policies. Advising public health injury prevention policy makers on prevention and control policies with the ultimate goal of reducing the burden of the injury (incidence, mortality, and disability).
Emphasizing on the importance of a two-way referral system. Strengthening an effective referral system ensures a close relationship between all levels of the health system and helps to ensure people receive the best possible care. It also assists in making cost-effective use of hospitals and primary health care services.
Fostering research and publication of results. Publishing research results contributes to the institution’s prestige and standing, to the education of peers, and also to serve as a conduit to establish links with other health care centers, with potential for clinical referral, training, and research opportunities.
Trauma Registry Tiers
An improved version of the ITSDP’s Trauma Registry was launched in January 2017. The Trauma Registry has a new integrated TIER/level design approach to meet the needs of every healthcare facility.
Trauma Registry Roadmap
The roadmap illustrates the steps or actions that healthcare facilities should follow to access the TR.
Benefits of Using the Trauma Registry
In general the TR intends to enable users mostly to: 1) assess and improve patient care; 2) identify opportunities for injury prevention initiatives; 3) document the medical, economic, and social effects of trauma; and 4) develop and test research hypotheses.
There are many other additional benefits for healthcare facilities and providers.
Trauma Registry Key Features
The ITSDP’s Trauma Registry has several unique features.
Best practices for data validation. Precise data quality rules and error review system are incorporated to avoid common human-related errors including incorrect or out-of-range values, missing values, responses that are logically inconsistent with other responses in the database, and duplication of patient records.
Reliable storing and securing data safeguards. Up-to-date policies, procedures and maintenance of information security controls are followed to protect private information, data and access.
Backing-up capabilities. Data entered into the registry is backed-up on a regular basis.
Web-based platform. Software has been developed to enable wireless devices (e.g. tablets) to collect data and transmit them over the internet to database servers. The TR is accessible from anywhere in the world using any type of device with internet connectivity.
Permit multiple languages. The platform is designed to support multiple languages. Currently English and Spanish is available, Portuguese coming soon.
User-friendly. Easy to use and understand data entry screens.
Require minimal data entry training. Although the data entry training is simple, it is recommended that data entry personnel have basic knowledge of medical terminology.
Customization. A modular configuration allow hospitals to create or modify their registries (tailored dataset) to satisfy their specific needs.
Access privileges to users. The TR supports multiple roles with varying degrees of access (viewer, data entry, manager).
Data variables are logically grouped in categories. Data variables are grouped in the following categories: demographic information, chief complaint, injury mechanism, prehospital, vital signs, physical exam, severity score, ED management and diagnosis, In-patient management, referral system.
Ability to search for specific existing trauma patients’ records. TR’s users can search at any time for specific and previously entered patient’s record.
Integration of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) and other relevant trauma-related scoring systems or indexes.
Capability to record referral system performance. Support two-way or multiple referral workflow built for trauma records.
Available pre-standardized reports. Users can use existing pre-standardized reports to facilitate data analysis process.
Saving of queries search. All queries search can be saved and stored for future use.
Data downloading options available. All data for the user’s specific hospital can be download into Excel spreadsheets.
Integrated user manual and training videos. Users have access to training videos to assist data entry and reporting.
ITSDP/TR Quality Assurance of Data Collection
The TR strive to adhere to the quality assurance principles recommended for patient registries 1. The ultimate objective of quality assurance principles is to guarantee the validity and reliability of the data collected. Validity refers to the credibility of the data. If data are valid, they must be reliable. In order for research data to be of value and of use, they must be both reliable and valid.
In order to maintain a high quality standard, the TR incorporated automated data validation checks for the correction or amelioration of data errors at the time of data entry. Common human-related data entry errors such as missing values, incorrect or out-of-range values, and inconsistent data and duplication of records are avoided.
In addition, the TR keeps track of changes made in the patient registries as a results of manual data cleaning procedures or mistakes; instead of simply replacing erroneous data with corrected data, the TR is able to flag data as erroneous without deleting them and to insert the corrected data for subsequent use.
The ITSDP suggest TR’s users the following steps for assuring data quality:
PILOT PHASE: Santa Cruz, Bolivia
photo credit: Bolivian Trauma Registry
Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia is the most populous city in the country, and was selected as the initial site for the trauma registry program due to strong local stakeholder engagement. The pilot phase of the ITSDP/PTS Trauma Registry began in January 2015 at one facility based on the Panamerican Trauma Society Essential Elements registry model. The selected hospital, Clínica Foianini, is a private, 50-bed, third-level facility located in the city center. Education and training sessions were held over two days with emergency room staff, who were selected to prospectively collect registry data using a two-page, paper form that reflected the variables within the electronic registry.
In October 2015, four additional facilities joined Clínica Foianini in the Bolivian Trauma Registry program, together constituting the institutions that treat the majority of trauma patients in the city. These include: